Thought I'd find proof of cheating on ACR, but I found leaks in my game

[NomadOmad]

So, I went down the rabbit hole recently. Uploaded 10,000 hands I played on ACR into ChatGPT, convinced that there had to be cheating. I mean, how else could I be down $27 on 2NL with my “high-level” play? But instead of uncovering superusers, I ended up finding leaks in my own game.

Apparently, open limping isn’t a thing anymore (who knew, right?), and folding Q4s to a raise is somehow the correct move. Oh, and betting 6x the pot on the flop? Yeah, apparently that’s “not valid.” I still think folding Q4s to a single raise from UTG is borderline psychic-level behavior. Are humans really capable of such restraint?

Look, I’m not saying there aren’t cheaters out there—I’ve seen some weird plays. But this little experiment turned into a lesson in humility. You guys should give it a try. Upload your hands, ask some tough questions, and see what you find. If nothing else, you’ll learn if your Q4s fold game is stronger than mine.

Anyone else tried something similar? Did you find proof of shadiness, or just get schooled on your own mistakes?

 

[Percy]

Analyzing 10,000 hands is a proper scientific approach. Bravo. The key takeaway here is that self-reflection often uncovers more 'cheating' in our play than in the system itself.